On Tue, 8 Aug 2000 06:28:27 +1000 (EST), Damian Conway wrote:
>I'd be inclined to drop the prefixes:
>
> foo(x: 10, y: 20);
> bar(z: 30, t: (1, 2, 3));
That doesn't look like Perl. ;-)
No, seriously: unless you can read those variables as x or y, I wouldn't
drop the prefixes. It's not consistent. If you use the values as $x or
@t, then please, use $x and @t in the above syntax, as well.
--
Bart.
- RFC 57 (v1) Subroutine prototypes and parameters Perl6 RFC Librarian
- Re: RFC 57 (v1) Subroutine prototypes and paramet... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 57 (v1) Subroutine prototypes and par... Jacob Davies
- Re: RFC 57 (v1) Subroutine prototypes and... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 57 (v1) Subroutine prototypes and paramet... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 57 (v1) Subroutine prototypes and par... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 57 (v1) Subroutine prototypes and paramet... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 57 (v1) Subroutine prototypes and paramet... Piers Cawley
- Re: RFC 57 (v1) Subroutine prototypes and par... Piers Cawley
- Re: RFC 57 (v1) Subroutine prototypes and paramet... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 57 (v1) Subroutine prototypes and par... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 57 (v1) Subroutine prototypes and... Jacob Davies
- Re: RFC 57 (v1) Subroutine prototypes... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 57 (v1) Subroutine proto... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 57 (v1) Subroutine p... Andy Wardley
- Re: RFC 57 (v1) Subrouti... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 57 (v1) Subrouti... Andy Wardley
- Re: RFC 57 (v1) Subrouti... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 57 (v1) Subrouti... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 57 (v1) Subrouti... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 57 (v1) Subrouti... Jonathan Scott Duff
