[Quoting Chaim Frenkel, on August 20 2000, 00:54, in "Re: RFC 132 (v1) sub"] > Why do you mind having an attribute? An attribute would - require the sub to be consequent in what it returns; - require the sub to be predeclared before it can be used; - make it unfeasable for methods. -- Johan
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should be... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should be able to return a... Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should be able to ret... Johan Vromans
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should be able to... Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should be abl... Johan Vromans
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should be... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines shou... Johan Vromans
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should be abl... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should be... Johan Vromans
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines shou... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines ... Johan Vromans
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines ... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines ... Johan Vromans
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines ... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines shou... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should be able to ret... David L. Nicol
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should be able to return a... David L. Nicol
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should be able to ret... Johan Vromans
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should be able to... Tom Christiansen