Perl6 RFC Librarian wrote:
>
> As a thought guide: think of C<lreturn> returning a reference to its
> argument, and the call to lvsub() performing a dereference.
Thought guide? Given a macro language and reference reasonablizing,
this looks like you've just compeltely defined lreturn!
macrodef lreturn(*) return \*
Of course without reference reasonableizing, we've got problems.
Looks like a case for automatic dereferencing!
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should... Johan Vromans
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should be able ... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should be a... Johan Vromans
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines sh... Johan Vromans
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines sh... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines sh... Johan Vromans
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines sh... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should be able to retur... David L. Nicol
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should be able to return an ... David L. Nicol
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should be able to retur... Johan Vromans
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should be able to r... Tom Christiansen
