On Sat, 16 Sep 2000 10:26:48 +0100, Hildo Biersma wrote:
>> length(@ary) deserves a warning
>
>Right now, the Lint back-end gives a warning in these cases (use of
>array in scalar context).
>
>Can we make the RFC more generic, and propose to move the Lint warnings
>into the core?
But using arrays in a scalar context usually isn't an error.
--
Bart.
- RFC 238 (v1) length(@ary) deserves a warning Perl6 RFC Librarian
- Re: RFC 238 (v1) length(@ary) deserves a warning Michael G Schwern
- Re: RFC 238 (v1) length(@ary) deserves a warn... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 238 (v1) length(@ary) deserves a warning Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 238 (v1) length(@ary) deserves a warn... Michael G Schwern
- Re: RFC 238 (v1) length(@ary) deserves a warn... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 238 (v1) length(@ary) deserves a warning Hildo Biersma
- Re: RFC 238 (v1) length(@ary) deserves a warn... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 238 (v1) length(@ary) deserves a ... Hildo Biersma
- Re: RFC 238 (v1) length(@ary) deserve... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 238 (v1) length(@ary) deserves a warning Philip Newton
- Re: matters supersessionary (was: RFC 238 (v1... Tom Christiansen
