Michael G Schwern wrote:
>
> I'm surprised there hasn't be a good overhaul of the prototyping
> system proposeed yet. Your length() propsal wouldn't be the only
> think that can't be prototyped. print() is the simplest example.
I think print should probably become something like what Eryq suggested:
CORE::print { $main::DEFOUT->print(@_) }
With the function-style:
print($FILE @data);
being handled by a more general mechanism to coerce it into:
print $FILE (@data);
like the one in RFC 174 (v2 due out today, hopefully).
-Nate
- RFC 238 (v1) length(@ary) deserves a warning Perl6 RFC Librarian
- Re: RFC 238 (v1) length(@ary) deserves a warning Michael G Schwern
- Re: RFC 238 (v1) length(@ary) deserves a warn... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 238 (v1) length(@ary) deserves a warning Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 238 (v1) length(@ary) deserves a warn... Michael G Schwern
- Re: RFC 238 (v1) length(@ary) deserves a warn... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 238 (v1) length(@ary) deserves a warning Hildo Biersma
- Re: RFC 238 (v1) length(@ary) deserves a warn... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 238 (v1) length(@ary) deserves a ... Hildo Biersma
- Re: RFC 238 (v1) length(@ary) deserve... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 238 (v1) length(@ary) deserves a warning Philip Newton
- Re: matters supersessionary (was: RFC 238 (v1... Tom Christiansen
