Re: RFC: lexical variables made default

[Jonathan Scott Duff]

On Wed, Aug 02, 2000 at 09:15:38AM -0600, Tom Christiansen wrote:
> >On Wed, Aug 02, 2000 at 08:45:04AM -0600, Tom Christiansen wrote:
> >> Anything one chooses potentially conflicts with the user's namespace, but
> >> probably save() or temp() would be better, or even savetemp() or tempsave()
> >> or scopetemp().
> 
> >How about deliver() or preserve()?
> 
> I can slightly grok the latter, but not the former.  What are you
> thinking there?

Ah, I was thinking of save() and how it could be deliverance.

-Scott
-- 
Jonathan Scott Duff
[EMAIL PROTECTED]