On Wed, Aug 02, 2000 at 08:45:04AM -0600, Tom Christiansen wrote: > >On Tue, 1 Aug 2000 23:43:24 -0500, Jonathan Scott Duff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >wrote: > > >> (I, for one, support renaming local() to Something Better (if only I > >> know what that was)) > Anything one chooses potentially conflicts with the user's namespace, but > probably save() or temp() would be better, or even savetemp() or tempsave() > or scopetemp(). or saveval() # indicates it is about _values_, not about variables tempval() or saverestore() # name says what the operator does or myval() # my _value_, not my(variable) or even pushpop() # maybe not :-) -- Tad McClellan SGML consulting [EMAIL PROTECTED] Perl programming Fort Worth, Texas
- RFC: lexical variables made default J. David Blackstone
- Re: RFC: lexical variables made default Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC: lexical variables made default Juanma Barranquero
- Re: RFC: lexical variables made default Michael Mathews
- Re: RFC: lexical variables made defau... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC: lexical variables made ... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC: lexical variables m... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC: lexical variabl... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC: lexical variables made ... Tad McClellan
- Re: RFC: lexical variables m... John Porter
- Re: lexical variables made default Jeremy Howard
- Re: lexical variables made default Ted Ashton
- Re: lexical variables made default Tom Christiansen
- Re: lexical variables made default Graham Barr
- RFC: lexical variables made default (revised) J. David Blackstone
- Re: RFC: lexical variables made default (revi... John Tobey
- Re: RFC: lexical variables made default (... J. David Blackstone
- Re: RFC: lexical variables made default (revi... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC: lexical variables made default (... J. David Blackstone