On Thu, Aug 03, 2000 at 06:39:02AM -0700, Randal L. Schwartz wrote: > Nope. Sometimes my brain prefers the EXPR if EXPR form because of > the much smaller punctuation footprint. Removing the comma > doesn't seem to serve anything but making Perl less powerful, and > not confusing Chaim quite as often. True, but maybe a lower precedance keword is needed like we did or || and &&. I think someone suggested "then" print $string1, $string2, "\n" then return 3 if $cond; then again, maybe not. Graham.
- RE: perl 6 requirements Brust, Corwin
- Re: perl 6 requirements Chaim Frenkel
- Re: perl 6 requirements Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: perl 6 requirements Martyn Pearce
- Re: perl 6 requirements Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: perl 6 requirements Chaim Frenkel
- Re: perl 6 requirements Steve Fink
- Re: perl 6 requirements Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: perl 6 requirements Bart Lateur
- Re: perl 6 requirements Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: perl 6 requirements Graham Barr
- Re: perl 6 requirements Tom Christiansen
- Re: perl 6 requirements Buddha Buck
- Re: perl 6 requirements John Porter
- Re: perl 6 requirements Piers Cawley
- Re: perl 6 requirements Bart Lateur
- Re: perl 6 requirements Peter Scott
- Re: perl 6 requirements Graham Barr
- Re: perl 6 requirements Chaim Frenkel
- Re: perl 6 requirements Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: perl 6 requirements Graham Barr