>True, but maybe a lower precedance keword is needed like we did
>or || and &&. I think someone suggested "then"
> print $string1, $string2, "\n" then return 3 if $cond;
>then again, maybe not.
Why not just piss everybody off?
return 3 after print $string1, $string2 if $cond;
honk love forth if.
--tom
- Re: perl 6 requirements Chaim Frenkel
- Re: perl 6 requirements Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: perl 6 requirements Martyn Pearce
- Re: perl 6 requirements Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: perl 6 requirements Chaim Frenkel
- Re: perl 6 requirements Steve Fink
- Re: perl 6 requirements Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: perl 6 requirements Bart Lateur
- Re: perl 6 requirements Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: perl 6 requirements Graham Barr
- Re: perl 6 requirements Tom Christiansen
- Re: perl 6 requirements Buddha Buck
- Re: perl 6 requirements John Porter
- Re: perl 6 requirements Piers Cawley
- Re: perl 6 requirements Bart Lateur
- Re: perl 6 requirements Peter Scott
- Re: perl 6 requirements Graham Barr
- Re: perl 6 requirements Chaim Frenkel
- Re: perl 6 requirements Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: perl 6 requirements Graham Barr
- Re: perl 6 requirements Randal L. Schwartz
