Re: Recording what we decided *not* to do, and why

[Steve Simmons]

On Fri, Aug 04, 2000 at 01:18:36PM -0400, John Porter wrote:

> O.k., what I really meant was, When they're both incapable of doing
> the sorts of things I want a macro language to do, does it matter
> that one is gobs more powerful than the other?

I freely admit to knowing very little about macro languages other
than m4 and cpp; if you've got a set of features that you think
would be better it'd make grist for an RFC.  There seems to be
moderate sentiment for a macro language and no strong opposition,
go for it.