Re: Recording what we decided *not* to do, and why

[Johan Vromans]

John Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> But a standardized macro facility would be nice. Although --
> wouldn't it have to parse perl? Or else have a wholly distinct
> grammar?

Several macro processors exist and are easily available. I do not see
the need to duplicate (parts of) their functionality in perl.
Personally, I'd even trow out -P.

-- Johan