At 12:59 PM 8/10/00 -0400, John Porter wrote:
>I'd like to recommend just "catch" instead of "otherwise",
>because sometimes you'll do this:
>
> try {
> # fragile code
> }
> catch {
> # handle other exceptions
> };
>
>And it would look silly to use "otherwise" there.
>
>You could make it so "catch" takes a list of 0 or more exception
>class names.
I like this. I will modify RFC 63 accordingly, although I note that RFC 88
is proposing something extremely similar.
--
Peter Scott
Pacific Systems Design Technologies
