> I know other languages call it zip, but personally I dislike > that name as zip() is commonly used with reference to compression. Ditto, I really dislike zip() and unzip(). They're PC and even UNIX commands on several platforms now, increasing confusion. Here's two names: mix() and unmix(). It's what's happening, right? Just as short too. > No need for the \ other builtin operators like shift,pop,splice > etc dont need them, zip should not either. Agreed. -Nate
- RFC 90 (v1) Builtins: zip() and unzip() Perl6 RFC Librarian
- Re: RFC 90 (v1) Builtins: zip() and unzip() Graham Barr
- Re: RFC 90 (v1) Builtins: zip() and unzip() Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 90 (v1) Builtins: zip() and unzip... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: RFC 90 (v1) Builtins: zip() and unzip() Andy Wardley
- Re: RFC 90 (v1) Builtins: zip() and unzip... John Porter
- Re: RFC 90 (v1) Builtins: zip() and unzip... Graham Barr
- Re: RFC 90 (v1) Builtins: zip() and u... Damien Neil
- Re: RFC 90 (v1) Builtins: zip() ... Dave Storrs
- Re: RFC 90 (v1) Builtins: zi... Ariel Scolnicov
- Re: RFC 90 (v1) Builtins: zip() and unzip... Brad Hughes
- Re: RFC 90 (v1) Builtins: zip() and u... Mike Pastore
- Re: RFC 90 (v1) Builtins: zip() and unzip... Damian Conway