On Fri, Aug 11, 2000 at 10:51:45AM -0400, John Porter wrote: > Damian Conway wrote: > > > > More and more I lean towards a scalar-only reduce. > > Yep! Have you stollen my brain :) Graham.
- Re: RFC 76 (v1) Builtin: reduce Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 76 (v1) Builtin: reduce Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 76 (v1) Builtin: reduce Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 76 (v1) Builtin: reduce Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 76 (v1) Builtin: reduce Jeremy Howard
- Re: RFC 76 (v1) Builtin: reduce Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 76 (v1) Builtin: reduce Glenn Linderman
- Re: RFC 76 (v1) Builtin: reduce Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 76 (v1) Builtin: reduce John Porter
- Re: RFC 76 (v1) Builtin: reduce Piers Cawley
- Re: RFC 76 (v1) Builtin: reduce Graham Barr
- Re: RFC 76 (v1) Builtin: reduce Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 76 (v1) Builtin: reduce Adam Krolnik
- Re: RFC 76 (v1) Builtin: reduce Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: RFC 76 (v1) Builtin: reduce Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 76 (v1) Builtin: reduce Piers Cawley
- Re: RFC 76 (v1) Builtin: reduce Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 76 (v1) Builtin: reduce Jeremy Howard
- Re: RFC 76 (v1) Builtin: reduc... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 76 (v1) Builtin: reduc... Jeremy Howard
- Re: RFC 76 (v1) Builtin: reduc... Damian Conway