At 11:15 AM 8/14/00 -0700, Nathan Wiger wrote:
>I'm going to actually ask for a new mailing sublist, probably called
>-object, on which this should be discussed. There's lots and lots and
>lots and lots of details to work out.
It might be best to wait a bit and see how the proposed internal
representation settles down first. You may find a lot of this isn't
actually necessary.
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
- RFC 89 (v2) Controllable Data Typing Perl6 RFC Librarian
- Re: RFC 89 (v2) Controllable Data Typing Jeremy Howard
- Re: RFC 89 (v2) Controllable Data Typing James Mastros
- Re: RFC 89 (v2) Controllable Data Typing Nathan Wiger
- RE: RFC 89 (v2) Controllable Data Typing Lipscomb, Al
- Re: RFC 89 (v2) Controllable Data Typing Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 89 (v2) Controllable Data Typing Nathan Wiger
- RE: RFC 89 (v2) Controllable Data Typing Dan Sugalski
- RE: RFC 89 (v2) Controllable Data Typing Lipscomb, Al
- Re: RFC 89 (v2) Controllable Data Typing Jonathan Scott Duff
- RE: RFC 89 (v2) Controllable Data Typing Lipscomb, Al
- Re: RFC 89 (v2) Controllable Data Typing Syloke Soong
- Re: RFC 89 (v2) Controllable Data Typing Syloke Soong
