At 01:48 PM 8/14/00 -0500, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
> > How 'bout 100ns ticks from base date, stored in a 64-bit number? That
>
>We are going to have quads supported on all platforms, then? With
>software emulation of our own if nothing else is available? I wouldn't
>object, mind...
I'd like to provide ints of that size, yes. Whether they're native (on,
say, Alphas or SPARCs), faked by the compiler, or faked by perl is an open
question, but I would like them in. This might end up in BigInt format
instead of plain int if the platform integers are too small, but that's OK,
I think.
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
- RFC 99 (v1) Maintain internal time in Modified Julian ... Perl6 RFC Librarian
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain internal time in Modifie... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain internal time in Mod... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain internal time in... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain internal tim... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain internal time in... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain internal tim... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain interna... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain int... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain... Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain... Russ Allbery
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain... Glenn Linderman
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain... Tim Jenness
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain... Russ Allbery
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain... Nathan Wiger
