On Fri, Aug 18, 2000 at 10:39:36AM -0500, Brian Wheeler wrote: > "Using" might be an interesting alternative Reminds me of BASIC :-) > What if the hash keys we want to use are not valid scalar names? For example, > I've had keys like "total - female" as keys, but using the ^ syntax > would fail on this... Good point. But who's to say that ^{total - female} doesn't work? -Scott -- Jonathan Scott Duff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: pascal-like "with" was Re: Default file... Dave Storrs
- Re: pascal-like "with" was Re: Default fileh... Clayton Scott
- Re: pascal-like "with" was Re: Default fileh... Dave Storrs
- implied pascal-like "with" or "express&... David L. Nicol
- Re: implied pascal-like "with" or "expr... Jeremy Howard
- Re: implied pascal-like "with" or "expr... David L. Nicol
- Re: implied pascal-like "with" or "expr... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: implied pascal-like "with" or "expr... David L. Nicol
- Re: implied pascal-like "with" or "expr... Dave Storrs
- Re: implied pascal-like "with" or "expr... Brian Wheeler
- Re: implied pascal-like "with" or "expr... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: implied pascal-like "with" or "expr... Dave Storrs
- Re: implied pascal-like "with" or "expr... Ken Fox
- Re: implied pascal-like "with" or "expr... Jeremy Howard
- Re: implied pascal-like "with" or "expr... David L. Nicol
- Re: implied pascal-like "with" or "expr... Ken Fox
- Re: implied pascal-like "with" or "expr... Damian Conway
- Re: implied pascal-like "with" or "expr... Jeremy Howard
- Re: implied pascal-like "with" or "expr... Damian Conway
- Re: implied pascal-like "with" or "expr... James Mastros
- Re: implied pascal-like "with" or "expr... Damian Conway