[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I think all discussion fo RFC 76 (reduce) should be on the new -data > sublist. Jeremy, am I on track here? > You sure are. Any stuff related to data crunching features belongs over there, please.
- Re: RFC 76 (v1) Builtin: reduce Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 76 (v1) Builtin: reduce Glenn Linderman
- Re: RFC 76 (v1) Builtin: reduce Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 76 (v1) Builtin: reduce Jeremy Howard
- Re: RFC 76 (v1) Builtin: reduce Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 76 (v1) Builtin: reduce Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 76 (v1) Builtin: reduce Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 76 (v1) Builtin: reduce Ken Fox
- Re: RFC 76 (v1) Builtin: reduce Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 76 (v1) Builtin: reduce skud
- Re: RFC 76 (v1) Builtin: reduce Jeremy Howard
- Re: RFC 76 (v1) Builtin: reduce Ed Mills
- Re: RFC 76 (v1) Builtin: reduce Stephen P. Potter