Graham Barr wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 31, 2000 at 03:55:28PM +1100, Damian Conway wrote:
> > And has anyone pointed out that C<list> is just:
> >
> > sub list {@_}
>
> Um no. I would expect it to be
>
> sub list { @_[0..$#_] }
According to my quickie tests, both have the desired effect
(supplying list context to the argument expression).
--
John Porter
We're building the house of the future together.
- RFC 175 (v1) Add C<list> keyword to force list c... Perl6 RFC Librarian
- Re: RFC 175 (v1) Add C<list> keyword to for... skud
- Re: RFC 175 (v1) Add C<list> keyword to... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 175 (v1) Add C<list> keyword to for... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 175 (v1) Add C<list> keyword to... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 175 (v1) Add C<list> keyword to... Graham Barr
- Re: RFC 175 (v1) Add C<list> keywor... John Porter
- Re: RFC 175 (v1) Add C<list> keyword to... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 175 (v1) Add C<list> keywor... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 175 (v1) Add C<list> ke... Peter Scott
- Re: RFC 175 (v1) Add C<list> keyword to... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 175 (v1) Add C<list> keywor... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 175 (v1) Add C<list> ke... Steve Fink
- Re: RFC 175 (v1) Add C<list&g... Graham Barr
- Re: RFC 175 (v1) Add C<list&g... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 175 (v1) Add C<list> ke... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 175 (v1) Add C<list&g... Tom Christiansen
