Nathan Wiger wrote: > I pushed a lot of these issues in RFC 319 and 337, which would let you > say something like: > > my Pet @pets :mean; # integrated implicit tie > @pets->attributes('mean') # "true", like 'can' Blech. exists @pets:mean # true -- John Porter
- Re: Variable attributes (was Re: RFC... Peter Scott
- Re: Variable attributes (was Re: RFC... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Variable attributes (was Re: RFC... Nathan Wiger
- Re: Variable attributes (was Re: RFC... Peter Scott
- Re: Variable attributes (was Re: RFC... Nathan Wiger
- Re: Variable attributes (was Re: RFC... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Variable attributes (was Re: RFC... Peter Scott
- Re: Variable attributes (was Re: RFC... Nathan Wiger
- Re: Variable attributes (was Re: RFC... Peter Scott
- Re: Variable attributes (was Re: RFC... Nathan Wiger
- Re: Variable attributes (was Re: RFC... John Porter
- Re: Variable attributes (was Re: RFC... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Variable attributes (was Re: RFC... John Porter
- Re: Variable attributes (was Re: RFC... David L. Nicol
- Re: RFC 355 (v1) Leave $[ alone. Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 355 (v1) Leave $[ alone. Nicholas Clark
- Re: RFC 355 (v1) Leave $[ alone. Trond Michelsen
- Re: RFC 355 (v1) Leave $[ alone. Glenn Linderman