Nathan Wiger wrote:
> I pushed a lot of these issues in RFC 319 and 337, which would let you
> say something like:
>
> my Pet @pets :mean; # integrated implicit tie
> @pets->attributes('mean') # "true", like 'can'
Blech.
exists @pets:mean # true
--
John Porter
- Re: Variable attributes (was Re: RFC... Peter Scott
- Re: Variable attributes (was Re: RFC... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Variable attributes (was Re: RFC... Nathan Wiger
- Re: Variable attributes (was Re: RFC... Peter Scott
- Re: Variable attributes (was Re: RFC... Nathan Wiger
- Re: Variable attributes (was Re: RFC... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Variable attributes (was Re: RFC... Peter Scott
- Re: Variable attributes (was Re: RFC... Nathan Wiger
- Re: Variable attributes (was Re: RFC... Peter Scott
- Re: Variable attributes (was Re: RFC... Nathan Wiger
- Re: Variable attributes (was Re: RFC... John Porter
- Re: Variable attributes (was Re: RFC... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Variable attributes (was Re: RFC... John Porter
- Re: Variable attributes (was Re: RFC... David L. Nicol
- Re: RFC 355 (v1) Leave $[ alone. Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 355 (v1) Leave $[ alone. Nicholas Clark
- Re: RFC 355 (v1) Leave $[ alone. Trond Michelsen
- Re: RFC 355 (v1) Leave $[ alone. Glenn Linderman
