Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote: > This reminds me of a related but rather opposite desire I have had > more than once: a quotish context that would be otherwise like q() but > with some minimal extra typing I could mark a scalar or an array to be > expanded as in qq(). For example doubling the $ and @? $$foo, @@bar? > This comes in handy when you are generating big blocks of code on the > fly but only tiny parts of it needs to be interpolated. Unfortunately > the margin of my monitor is not enough to describe this wonderful idea > in a form of a RFC. $qqdString =~ s/\[(\w+)\]/defined($vars{$1})?$vars{$1}:"[$1]"/ge; -- David Nicol 816.235.1187 [EMAIL PROTECTED] "After jotting these points down, we felt better."
- Conversion of undef() to string user overridable for ea... Bart Lateur
- Re: Conversion of undef() to string user overridab... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Conversion of undef() to string user overr... Mark-Jason Dominus
- Re: Conversion of undef() to string user o... Brad Hughes
- Re: Conversion of undef() to string user o... Steve Fink
- Re: Conversion of undef() to string user overr... David L. Nicol
- Re: Conversion of undef() to string user o... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Conversion of undef() to string user overridab... Peter Scott
- Re: Conversion of undef() to string user overridab... Eric Roode
- Re: Conversion of undef() to string user overr... Glenn Linderman
- Re: Conversion of undef() to string user o... Nathan Wiger
- Re: Conversion of undef() to string us... Glenn Linderman