Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return"

[John Porter]

Damian Conway wrote:
> 
> RFC 271 handles this. Your example would be:
> 
>         sub readit {
>             open F, "< $f" ...
>             scalar(<F>)
>         }
>         post readit {
>             close F;
>         }

Really?  Are lexicals in the sub visible in the post handler?

(Of course I realize *F does not illustrate this...)

-- 
John Porter

Ann wenno haddum billizac...