> Really? Are lexicals in the sub visible in the post handler? No. Only the original arguments and the return value. > (Of course I realize *F does not illustrate this...) Exactly. ;-) Actually, I do agree that Perl 6 ought to provide a universal "destructor" mechanism on *any* block. For historical reasons, I suppose it should be C<continue>, though I would much prefer a more generic name, such as C<cleanup>. Damian
- Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of... Simon Cozens
- Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of... John Porter
- Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of... James Mastros
- Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of... Simon Cozens
- Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of... James Mastros
- Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of... John Porter
- Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of... Damian Conway
- Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of... Damian Conway
- Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable inste... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of... John Porter
- Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable inste... David L. Nicol
- Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of... abigail
- Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of... abigail
- Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of... David L. Nicol
- Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of... Glenn Linderman