Simon Cozens wrote: > John Porter wrote: > > But they are inextricably bound by perl's parsing rules. > > Perl 5's parsing rules. I don't think Perl 6 *has* a parser just yet. As someone else said before me, Perl should not be changed Just Because We Can. Aspects which have proven usefulness and are deeply engrained in the Perl mindset should not be tampered with just because some recent convert finds them un-Algol-like. -- John Porter
- The binding of "my" (Re: Closures and default ... Nathan Wiger
- Re: The binding of "my" (Re: Closures and... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: The binding of "my" (Re: Closures and... Branden
- Re: The binding of "my" (Re: Closures... John Porter
- Re: The binding of "my" (Re: Closures and... John Porter
- Re: The binding of "my" (Re: Closures and... Simon Cozens
- Re: The binding of "my" (Re: Closures and... John Porter
- Re: The binding of "my" (Re: Closures and... Johan Vromans
- Re: The binding of "my" (Re: Closures... John Porter