At 02:49 PM 4/16/2001 -0500, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote: >Thinking about the 5->6 migration and coexistence is good and useful, >but since that doesn't advance the Prime Directive, thinking about it >*too* much now or fighting over the niggly details is somewhat wasted >effort. We have been stuck in a sort of Gilbert and Sullivan debate, haven't we? Silly, definitely silly. Dan --------------------------------------"it's like this"------------------- Dan Sugalski even samurai [EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even teddy bears get drunk
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: Larry's Apocal... Peter Scott
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: Larry's Apocal... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: Larry's Apocal... Nathan Wiger
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: Larry's A... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: Larry's Apocal... Peter Scott
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: Larry's A... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: Larry's Apocal... Dan Sugalski
- RE: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: Larry's A... David Whipp
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: Larry's A... Edward Peschko
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: Larry's Apocal... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: Larry's Apocal... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: Larry's Apocal... Tim Bunce
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: Larry's A... Ask Bjoern Hansen
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: Larry's Apocal... John Porter
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: Larry's A... Simon Cozens
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: Larry's A... Edward Peschko
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: Larry's Apocal... Dan Sugalski