On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 04:46:48PM -0700, Larry Wall wrote:
> And I'm tired of hearing the argument that Perl programmers can't get
> used to a different operator for concatenation. I know better--after
> all, Perl is probably what got them used to . in the first place. If
> you can teach dogs to salivate at a bell, you can probably teach them
> to salivate at a dog biscuit. :-)
I think many of us are resigned to losing . for concatination; I know
I can live with that. I just don't want to have this result in ~, ^,
or any other C-style punctuation operator getting renamed. I like the
fact that Perl follows the same operator conventions as C, C++, Java
and others in this area; breaking with tradition here for the sake of
aligning . feels inelegant.
Renaming . to cc wouldn't bother me half so much.
- Damien
- a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g Fred Heutte
- Re: a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g Casey West
- Re: a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g Damien Neil
- Re: a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g Graham Barr
- Re: a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g Bart Lateur
- Re: a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g Bart Lateur
- Re: a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g Fred Heutte
- Re: a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g Graham Barr
- Re: a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g Nathan Wiger
- Re: a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g Larry Wall
- Re: a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g Damien Neil
- Re: a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g David L. Nicol
- Re: a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g Simon Cozens
- Re: a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g Larry Wall
- Re: a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g Michael G Schwern
- Re: a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g John Porter
- Re: a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g Damian Conway
- Re: a modest proposal Re: s/./~/g Fred Heutte
