Re: Apoc2 - concerns

[Nathan Wiger]

> We do have to worry about the C<next> loop control function though.
> It's possible that in
>
>     FOO: while (1) {
> next FOO if /foo/;
> ...
>     }
>
> the C<FOO> label is actually being recognized as a pseudo-package
> name!  The loop could well be an object whose full name is C<MY::FOO>.
> Or something like that.  But maybe that's a gross hack.  Seems a bit
> odd to overload C<next> like that.  Maybe we need a different word.

I don't want to get accused of too much bikeshed-painting :-), but seems
like "more" would work:

   $line = more $FOO;

This also connotes generalized incrementing, so it serves that purpose too.

And, hey, there's "less" for decrementing too!

-Nate