Bart Lateur wrote: > David L. Nicol wrote: > >we undo the Great Perl5 > >Dilution and undecorate references. > > Undecorated if for function calls and methods. And buolt-ins, of course. No, that's the situation already. David is proposing a change. > So what you're really saying is that references aren't really scalars, > but their own type. Thus they need their own prefix. No, that does not follow. -- John Porter
- what I meant about hungarian notation David L. Nicol
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation David L. Nicol
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Matt Youell
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Bart Lateur
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Bart Lateur
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation David L. Nicol
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation John Porter
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Bart Lateur
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Dan Sugalski
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Simon Cozens
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Eric Roode
- RE: what I meant about hungarian notation David Grove
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation David L. Nicol
- RE: what I meant about hungarian notation David Grove
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Matt Youell
- RE: what I meant about hungarian notation David Grove
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Bryan C . Warnock