>I happen to like $ and @. They're not going away in standard Perl as >long as I have anything to do with it. Nevertheless, my vision for Perl >is that it enable people to do what *they* want, not what I want. > >Larry If only that were true...But it isn't true. It was never true. And you knew that it wasn't true when you said it. Of course, you can sit behind the definition of *they*...After all, who are "they"? New p6 programmers? Acolytes of Perl? ActiveState? my ORA? p5p? Hillary "33 builds of perl6 on the wall, 33 builds of perl6..." --
- RE: what I meant about hungarian notation David Grove
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation John Porter
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Larry Wall
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Simon Cozens
- RE: what I meant about hungarian notation David Grove
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Larry Wall
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation John Porter
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Graham Barr
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Simon Cozens
- RE: what I meant about hungarian notation Hillary
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Hillary
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Larry Wall
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Me
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Larry Wall
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation John Porter
- RE: what I meant about hungarian notation David Grove
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Simon Cozens
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation David L. Nicol