RE: what I meant about hungarian notation

[David Grove]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2001 11:58 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: what I meant about hungarian notation
>
>
> Larry Wall wrote:
> >
> > : do you think conflating @ and % would be a perl6 design win?
> >
> > Nope, I still think most ordinary people want different operators for
> > strings than for numbers.
>
> Different operators, conflated data type.
>
> That's what we have for scalars already.
>
> Makes sense to have it for containers indexed by scalar as well.

I don't disagree that it's a good thing, but with this piece alone aren't we
falling FAAAAAAR short of that 95% mark?

p