> Hm, OK. What does this access and using what method ? > > $foo = '1.2'; > @bar[$foo]; This is an argument against conflating @ and %. It has nothing to do with using [] instead of {}. (I accept that the @/% issue is problematic. Otoh, I don't yet see @/% conflation as being obviously a bad move in the way you and Larry seem to.) > Having different brackets for accessing array or hash > actually does help when reading code. Using the same > is just adding unnecessary complexity I can't tell if you mean this as a summary of your earlier points, in which case please note response above, or a separate point. If it is a separate point, you don't say why, so, why?
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Simon Cozens
- RE: what I meant about hungarian notation <C. Garrett Goebel>
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Me
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Larry Wall
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Me
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Damian Conway
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Michael G Schwern
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Me
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Graham Barr
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Me
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Graham Barr
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Buddha Buck
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Damian Conway
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Graham Barr
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation John Porter
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Graham Barr
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation John Porter
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Graham Barr
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Me