Daniel S. Wilkerson wrote: > I can't imagine any way in which one can consider Perl typing to be "strong". > When you know the type of a variable, you are supposed to have confidence > that when you see a statement > a - lexically locally (without looking around elsewhere) and > b - at compile time > you know exactly what the statement means. No, that is not "strong typing". That is "static typing". -- John Porter
- Re: Properties and stricture Michael G Schwern
- Re: Properties and stricture Peter Scott
- Re: Properties and stricture John Porter
- Re: Properties and stricture Michael G Schwern
- RE: Properties and stricture Garrett Goebel
- Re: Properties and stricture Daniel S. Wilkerson
- Re: Properties and stricture Michael G Schwern
- Re: Properties and stricture Michael G Schwern
- RE: Properties and stricture David Whipp
- Re: Properties and stricture Daniel S. Wilkerson
- Re: Properties and stricture John Porter
- Re: Properties and stricture Daniel S. Wilkerson
- Re: Properties and stricture Simon Cozens
- Re: Properties and stricture John Porter
- Re: Properties and stricture Daniel S. Wilkerson
- Re: Properties and stricture Michael G Schwern
- Re: Properties and stricture Daniel S. Wilkerson
- Re: Properties and stricture Daniel S. Wilkerson
- Re: Properties and stricture Michael G Schwern
- Re: Properties and stricture John Porter
- Re: Properties and stricture Peter Scott