On Tue, Jun 05, 2001 at 02:39:33PM -0700, Daniel S. Wilkerson wrote: > Thank you, that's what I thought it might be. This can be done at > compile time with a two-stage compilation. The first one writes the > code that the second compiles. Then the checking can be done during > the second stage. Yeah, but that's yicky and limiting and involves temp files and you have to know everything you want to generate before you run the program. Anyhow, I think we can save the technique even with strict-types. -- Michael G. Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/ Perl6 Quality Assurance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Kwalitee Is Job One GOD made us funky!
- RE: Properties and stricture David Whipp
- Re: Properties and stricture Daniel S. Wilkerson
- Re: Properties and stricture John Porter
- Re: Properties and stricture Daniel S. Wilkerson
- Re: Properties and stricture Simon Cozens
- Re: Properties and stricture John Porter
- Re: Properties and stricture Daniel S. Wilkerson
- Re: Properties and stricture Michael G Schwern
- Re: Properties and stricture Daniel S. Wilkerson
- Re: Properties and stricture Daniel S. Wilkerson
- Re: Properties and stricture Michael G Schwern
- Re: Properties and stricture John Porter
- Re: Properties and stricture Peter Scott
- Re: Properties and stricture John Porter
- DANGER! ADVOCACY! (was Re: Properties and stric... Michael G Schwern
- Re: Properties and stricture Michael G Schwern
- Re: Properties and stricture Daniel S. Wilkerson
- Re: Properties and stricture Michael G Schwern
- Re: Properties and stricture Damien Neil
- Re: Properties and stricture Piers Cawley
- Re: Properties and stricture John Porter