At 10:26 PM 6/10/2001 +0100, Simon Cozens wrote:
>It doesn't matter, because the user can redefine the syntax anyway.
I'm staying completely out of the argument that spawned this (Though the
idea of welding SQL directly into perl has some appeal--it was one of the
few (okay, the only one I can think of, but there must have been others)
nice things about PL/SQL), but I would like to note that this statement,
while true, is effectively meaningless. Might as well say the same about
perl 5 because anyone who wanted to could hack toke.c.
Just because things are possible doesn't make them easy and, while they'll
be easier in perl 6 that still doesn't mean they'll be easy.
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
- Re: Multi-dimensional arrays and relational db data Me
- Re: Multi-dimensional arrays and relational db data Tim Jenness
- Re: Multi-dimensional arrays and relational db data schwern
- Re: Multi-dimensional arrays and relational db data Peter Scott
- Re: Multi-dimensional arrays and relational db data Vijay Singh
- Re: Multi-dimensional arrays and relational db data schwern
- Re: Multi-dimensional arrays and relational db data Simon Cozens
- Re: Multi-dimensional arrays and relational db data Daniel S. Wilkerson
- Re: Multi-dimensional arrays and relational db data Dan Sugalski
- Re: Multi-dimensional arrays and relational db data Simon Cozens
- Re: Multi-dimensional arrays and relational db data Dan Sugalski
- Re: Multi-dimensional arrays and relational db data Simon Cozens
- Re: Multi-dimensional arrays and relational db data Daniel S. Wilkerson
- Re: Multi-dimensional arrays and relational db data Dan Sugalski
- Re: Multi-dimensional arrays and relational db data Exservice
- RE: Multi-dimensional arrays and relational db data David Grove
- Re: Multi-dimensional arrays and relational db data David L. Nicol
- Re: Multi-dimensional arrays and relational db data David L. Nicol
