raptor wrote: > > for my $el1, $el2 ( @foo, @bar ) { Hopefully you mean for my $el1, my $el2 ( @foo, @bar ) { or maybe for [ my $el1, my $el2 ] ( @foo, @bar ) { And yes, it's an old idea. > PS. I was thinking of that before, what if we have something let's call it > 'transform' for transformation of any structure to other structure.. This sort of thing should certainly not be in the kernel. -- John Porter
- Re: array/hash manipulation [was :what's with 'with'?] raptor
- Re: array/hash manipulation [was :what's with 'with'?] John Porter
- Re: array/hash manipulation [was :what's with 'with'?] Jeremy Howard
- RE: array/hash manipulation [was :what's with 'with'?] Sterin, Ilya
- Re: array/hash manipulation [was :what's with 'with'?] raptor
- RE: array/hash manipulation [was :what's with 'with'?] Sterin, Ilya
- Re: array/hash manipulation [was :what's with 'with'?] Mark J. Reed
- Re: array/hash manipulation [was :what's with 'with'?] Eric Roode
- RE: array/hash manipulation [was :what's with 'with'?] Sterin, Ilya
- RE: array/hash manipulation [was :what's with 'with'?] Sterin, Ilya