On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 11:17:13AM -0600, Sterin, Ilya wrote:
> But this will be flattened, so I would think
>
> for my($key, $val)(%my_hash)
> { ... }
>
> Would be a great convenience. $key and $val being aliased accordingly.
I'm sorry, but I fail to see how this is a big improvement over the
current version:
while (my ($key, $val) = each %my_hash)
{ ... }
--
Mark J. REED <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Re: array/hash manipulation [was :what's with 'with'?] raptor
- Re: array/hash manipulation [was :what's with 'with'?] John Porter
- Re: array/hash manipulation [was :what's with 'with'?] Jeremy Howard
- RE: array/hash manipulation [was :what's with 'with'?] Sterin, Ilya
- Re: array/hash manipulation [was :what's with 'with'?] raptor
- RE: array/hash manipulation [was :what's with 'with'?] Sterin, Ilya
- Re: array/hash manipulation [was :what's with 'with'?] Mark J. Reed
- Re: array/hash manipulation [was :what's with 'with'?] Eric Roode
- RE: array/hash manipulation [was :what's with 'with'?] Sterin, Ilya
- RE: array/hash manipulation [was :what's with 'with'?] Sterin, Ilya
- RE: array/hash manipulation [was :what's with 'with'?] Sterin, Ilya
- Re: array/hash manipulation [was :what's with 'with'?] John Porter
- Re: array/hash manipulation [was :what's with 'with... Jeremy Howard
- Re: array/hash manipulation [was :what's with 'with'?] Jeremy Howard
- RE: array/hash manipulation [was :what's with 'with'?] jh_lists
