This makes no sense. ?: tests a boolean value, which is either true or false. There is no ternary state for a boolean value. True/False, Yes/No, On/Off, 1/0. Are you suggesting Yes/No/Maybe? Or are you redefining True and False? Doesn't matter. What you're asking has no counterpart in boolean logic, and as such would make no sense in any computer language. You may have an idea, but you are saying it wrong if you do. On Sunday 29 July 2001 07:22, raptor wrote: > cond ? then : else : otherwise
- if then else otherwise ... raptor
- Re: if then else otherwise ... Michael G Schwern
- RE: if then else otherwise ... Sterin, Ilya
- Re: if then else otherwise ... raptor
- Re: if then else otherwise ... David Grove
- RE: if then else otherwise ... Sterin, Ilya
- Re: if then else otherwise ... raptor
- Re: if then else otherwise ... David Grove
- Re: if then else otherwise ... John Porter
- Re: if then else otherwise ... Bart Lateur
- Re: if then else otherwise ... John Porter
- Re: if then else otherwise ... raptor
- Re: if then else otherwise ... raptor
- Re: if then else otherwise ... Bart Lateur
- FW: if then else otherwise ... Brent Dax
- Re: if then else otherwise ... Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: if then else otherwise ... raptor
- RE: if then else otherwise ... Sterin, Ilya