Re: What's up with %MY?

[Ken Fox]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Clearly caller() isn't what we want here, but I'm not
> quite sure what would be the correct incantation.

I've always assumed that a BEGIN block's caller() will
be the compiler. This makes it easy for the compiler to
lie about %MY:: and use the lexical scope being compiled
instead of the compiler's lexical scope.

- Ken