Whilst I don't wish to get Medieval on your collective donkey I must
say that I'm really not sure of the utility of the proposed infix
superposition ops. I'm a big fan of any/all/one/none, I just think
that
one(any($a, $b, $c), all($d, $e, $f))
Is a good deal more intention revealing than the superficially
appealing than
($a & $b & $c) ^ ( $d | $e | $f )
which takes rather more decoding. And if you *do* want to use such
operators, surely you could just do
use ops ':superpositions';
in an appropriate lexical scope. Am I missing something?
--
Piers
"It is a truth universally acknowledged that a language in
possession of a rich syntax must be in need of a rewrite."
-- Jane Austen?
