[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dave Storrs) writes:
> Just so I'm clear, are you saying that you think L2R is a bad idea,
> and should not be supported? Or just that it has not yet been
> demonstrated that this is a good idea?
I think supporting two distinct syntaces, one being a mirror image of
the other, is a bad idea. I'll leave people to argue over which one is
better because it keeps them out of the way. ;)
--
Congratulations, Simon - I think I've finally discovered someone with a
mind that is more warped than mine.
- Lionel Lauer
