"Austin Hastings" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > if ("Dough" eqn(4) "Douglas") ...
I wonder if the . operator is available here: if "Dough" eq.n(4) "Douglas" { ... } that makes it intuitive how to define new equality "methods". One thing of concern is that we'd need whitespace rules to disambiguate things. I sense some wonderful opportunities for obfuscation. Dave.