Michael Lazzaro writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dan Sugalski) writes: > > > Luke Palmer: > > > > > That's illegal anyway. Can't chain statement modifiers :-) > > > > Will be able to. > > I was under the strong impression that Larry had decided that > syntactic ambiguities prevented this from happening.
I also was under the strong impression that Larry had decreed that we wouldn't have chained statement modifiers ... but I thought it was because Larry had decided they would be a bad thing to have rather than because they aren't feasible. > (Now, of course, you will ask me for a cite to the thread, which I > can't even begin to find at this point...) Me neither. A Google Groups search on perl.perl6.language with the author 'Larry' doesn't through up anything relevant for "statement modifiers" or obvious variants. Smylers
