On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 03:16:11PM -0600, Luke Palmer wrote: > > But anyway, if you still want to be old school about it, then you'll end > up not caring about the scope of your $i. Really you won't. And you'll > be happy that it was kept around for you once you decide you want to > know the value of $i for which the loop terminated. > > Luke
Personally, I consider the new state of affairs to be a gift from G--...er...Larry (ah, what's the difference?). It always annoyed me to have to declared my vars outside the control structure when I often needed them afterwards. Thank you, Larry. --Dks
