Jonadab the Unsightly One writes:
> Austin Hastings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I think this is something that we'll want as a "mode", a la
> > case-insensitivity. Think of it as "mark insensitivity."
>
> Makes sense to me, but...
>
> > Maybe it can just roll into :i?
>
> It will probably get used in _conjunction_ with case-insensitivity
> quite a lot, but I suspect people will want to be able to use one
> without the other.
>
> Since mark-insensitivity is probably mostly a non-issue in the ASCII
> world, it would probably be a better candidate than average for being
> turned on using a unicode character, if we're running low on letters
> for designating these rules.
Or, god forbid, a word?
m:base/que mas/
We're not mathematicians: we're allowed to use more than one letter in a
row to designate something :-)
Luke
