> On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 05:48:59PM +1000, Damian Conway wrote:
> : But that's only the opinion of one(@Larry), not of $Larry.
> Let's go 0-based and make $0 =:= $/ so that $/ is all the parens.
> Our old $0 (P5's $&) could be $<> instead, short for $<MATCH> or some
Why can't bare $/ just striingify to the whole match?
> It's already the case that p5-to-p6 is going to have a *wonderful*
> time translating $7 to $1...
Not a real problem. Patrick has already said that his plan is that :p5 REs
will return a match object with an already flattened match list using perl5
left peren counting semantics.
> I wonder how much call there will be for a rule option that uses P6
> syntax but P5 paren binding with "push" semantics.
Just add a :flat