On Wed, 2005-05-11 at 17:48, Matt Fowles wrote: > On 5/11/05, Luke Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 5/11/05, Autrijus Tang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > In a somewhat related topic: > > > > > > pugs> (1,(2,3),4) > > > 4 > > > > > > Because the invocant to . assumes a Singular context. > > > > Right, but the *inside* of the invocant is still a list, so it's in > > list context. I think that line should return 3. > > I am confused as to why exactly this is the case. Are you saying that > nested lists like this flatten? That would certainly catch me off > guard. Would you mind explaining that to me a little more?
I'm confused as well. How does that play with Larry's comment: http://groups-beta.google.com/group/perl.perl6.language/browse_frm/thread/54a1135c012b97bf/d17b4bc5ae7db058?q=list+comma&rnum=5&hl=en#d17b4bc5ae7db058 -- Aaron Sherman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Senior Systems Engineer and Toolsmith "It's the sound of a satellite saying, 'get me down!'" -Shriekback