On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 09:20:21AM -0700, Larry Wall wrote:
> On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 10:55:43AM -0500, Jonathan Scott Duff wrote:
> : But perhaps the reduce operator is some of that sufficiently advanced
> : technology that "knows" how the operator it wraps is slotted and does
> : something appropriate. 
> Possibly.  Or we just define infix .{}. and .[]. variants, or some such.

It's funny what a big difference that extra character makes.  As much
as I disliked Juerd's idea to make infix .{} work, I wouldn't mind an
infix .{}. operator.

Jonathan Scott Duff

Reply via email to