On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 08:32:39AM -0700, Larry Wall wrote:
> I think that's a powerful argument even if we don't have an infix:<::>.
> Plus I hate all infix "nor" operators due to my English-speaking bias
> that requires a "neither" on the front.  So let's go ahead and make
> it ??!!.  (At least this week...)

Yay !!


Reply via email to