On 10/4/05, Miroslav Silovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Playing with pugs, I ran into this corner case:
>
> sub f($x) { say $x; }
> f {1}.(); # ok, outputs 1
>
> sub f([EMAIL PROTECTED]) { say @_; }
> f {1}.(); # outputs block, tries to call a method from the return of say,
> dies
>
> Whitespace after f doesn't change the behaviour (in either case). Is this
> behaviour a bug in pugs? Should . bind stronger than non-parenthesised
> function call regardless of slurpy?I think that's what it should do, yes. Luke
