On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 11:55:35AM -0500, Matt Fowles wrote:
: I think using C< ..5 > to mean (0, 1, 2, 3, 4) would be a more
: sensible option.  Makes sense to me at least.

That doesn't derive well from any of:

    ..
    ^..
    ..^
    ^..^

If the rule is "you can omit the 0", then it's ..^5 rather than ..5.

Larry

Reply via email to